Equity Brief: 2011 for my stocks January 10, 2012
Posted by shaferfinancial in Uncategorized.Tags: How I did
add a comment
I will go in much more in-depth when the year end financials are released over the next 45 days, but for now here are the top line results:
Berkshire Hathaway lost 4.8% of market value in 2011
Magellan Midstream Partners gained 22% of value plus I received dividend of 11% on my cost for a total gain of 33%
Health Care REIT gained 14.4% of value and I received dividends of 12% on my cost for a total gain of 26.4%.
Obviously, this is a very superficial look and a more in-depth discussion will happen later.
Why mutual funds are really a bad idea for retirement income funding. December 2, 2011
Posted by shaferfinancial in Finance, Uncategorized.Tags: Mutual Funds for retirement, The ugly truth on mutual funds
5 comments
I have blogged on this before. But, recently talking to folks looking into EIULs it has become clear it bears repeating. There are three problems with mutual funds that create real problems for those who use them for retirement financial planning.
1st: Most people purchase them inside a tax-deferred wrapper like 401Ks or IRAs. They are sold on the idea that they save money paid for taxes. This is demonstrably wrong. When you purchase mutual funds inside a 401K you are not avoiding taxes just deferring them to later. So instead of paying income tax on the income you receive you reduce it based on how much you put into your 401K. Most people hope there will be gains inside their retirement account. Indeed over the long run there should be. Here is the problem, the taxes you saved are based on how much you put in, while the taxes you pay will be based on how much you take out including the gains. So if you put in $250,000 over a lifetime and take out $500,000 during retirement you are saving $250,000 times your marginal tax level and paying $500,000 times your marginal tax level. You can see that the result is paying considerable more than you save. Bottom line this scheme does nothing but increase your taxes. A great deal for the government, a bad deal for you. And that doesn’t count any penalties or taxes you pay if you don’t follow their rules on withdrawals.
2nd: As many of you have discovered recently, market risk is understated by most who push this retirement scheme. That is severe market downturns are very dangerous to folks with limited time to invest. If you have an unlimited time line on investing, then there is always time to make up for the severe downdrafts that are always happening in the market. However, as your time line to retirement and using these funds go under 10 years, the risk you take on goes up dramatically. Imagine retiring anytime in the last 15 years dependent upon market returns! These folks simply have no where to turn. There is not enough time to make up for over a decade of real market losses. Many of these people have had to downsize their expected retirement income by over 50%. And the scary part is this isn’t the result of a once in a century bad market. No, these types of markets are as predictable as the sun setting. Since WWII you have the 1960s and early 1970s, you have the early 1980s, and the first decade of the new century. Those are all examples from the life span of current retirees. Try to find 25-30 years in there where there wasn’t significant market downturns? You can’t. This means that there is a certainty that you will experience this market behavior during your retirement years too! Imagine saving your whole life and a couple of years before retirement you have accumulated $1M. You think you can take $50K per year from your accounts during retirement and be pretty assured of not running out of money. But then on the eve of your retirement that $1M turns into $700,000. So now you are down to $35K per year. And then a decade of sideways movement turns your once comfortable nest egg into something that might last you to 80 if you really skimp or maybe not. This is called sequence of return risk and no manner of asset allocation advice will avoid this issue.
3rd: Expenses. Did you know that most of the major mutual fund management companies raised the internal expenses in their mutual funds during the great recession of 2008-09? Why did they do this? Because people were pulling out of mutual funds and they needed to maintain their profits. So while their customers were losing in their 401Ks, the companies did their share by taking more out of the pot! You see, not only do the companies not take on the market risk with you, but they think they bear no responsibility for the results of people investing with them. All that matters in their eyes are the companies profits. And these are the same people who are giving you advice to stay in mutual funds and what a great way to invest for retirement mutual funds are!
4th: Admittedly, this is a personal pet peeve. Their rules…..your money. Take your money before age 59 1/2 and you get penalized. I even had a client whose 401K was kept from him as long as he worked at the company or 59 1/2!!!! Don’t take the money in time, more penalties. Save too much…no can’t do that.
My personal journey had me realize all this over 10 years ago. It took me a few years to find a suitable replacement strategy and a few more years to divest myself of those pesky mutual funds. It was all worth it. And by the way since I have accomplished this my real returns have skyrocketed compared to mutual funds.
As many of my readers understand I am very open about what I am doing now and in fact starting selling one of the strategies [EIULs] I found works well. Many of my clients from both the Shafer Wealth Academy and EIULs have similar stories to tell about their awakening from the propaganda of Wall Street and the US Government. Other’s are not ready yet to open up their minds to the reality of the failure of mutual funds and 401Ks. Interestingly, Fidelity, a large mutual fund company, just released the average 401K level of its customers. $67,000. How long will $67,000 last in retirement?
Magellan Midstream Partners 3rd Quarter November 30, 2011
Posted by shaferfinancial in Finance.Tags: Magellan Midstream Partners, MMP
2 comments
The smallest holding I have and my newest stock is Magellan Midstream Partners.
Do I wish I had invested much more in this stock? Well, yes. Up over 100% since I bought it in 2009 it has been a big winner for me. But, I didn’t buy it for that reason. I bought it for it’s dividend stream. It’s most recent dividend was $.80 for the last quarter. It continues to grow.
Currently the dividend coverage is a healthy 129%.
It’s last quarter was the best ever with $137M in operating profits compared to $82M the third quarter of last year. Net income was $.98 per unit versus $.51 last year. It has $198M in cash available along with around $700M in unused credit. This last quarter’s profit was accomplished with a 8% decrease in gasoline movement [4% increase in Diesel and Jet Fuel]. All capital projects are progressing as proposed. There are a couple of new projects being discussed at this time. MMP has plenty of available cash as well as credit to make significant capital improvements if suitable projects are found.
In short, MMP is in very good shape going forward. My current yield to cost is approaching 11%. Unfortunately, this stock is no bargain at $63.98. I am more than satisfied with my investment in MMP, but as they say “timing is everything,” so I will be reticent to add to my holdings at the current price. I do reinvest dividends though so will end up with more as we go forward.
Health Care REIT after the 3rd Quarter November 17, 2011
Posted by shaferfinancial in Finance.Tags: Health Care REIT [HCN], Stocks I own
add a comment
HCN continues its great performance.
$644 M in new investments
FFO growth of 13% for the quarter
FAD growth of 7% for the quarter
FFO payout drops to 80% while FAD payout drops to 91%
Raised $632M in capital in November
Fixed charge coverage 2.5X
Debt to unappreciated Book Cap 43%
Dividend growth 4% for quarter
93% MOB Occupancy Rate
11.6% return over the last year
14.5% return over the last decade
This is the 11th year I have been investing in HCN. The strategy employed over the last 5-7 years is to move away from skilled nursing into medical office buildings, senior housing, and campus complexes with the whole medical facilities range [housing, assisted living, skilled nursing, medical office building, acute care hospitals]. Currently they are down to 27% skilled nursing and up to 18% MOBs and 46% in senior housing [either triple net leases or operating]. Geographically they are concentrated on the two coasts.
Currently the dividend yield to cost is 5.9%. My personal yield to cost is over 12%. This is a strong performer and in my opinion will continue to deliver great performance with the demographic tail wind pushing it along.
Berkshire Hathaway Continues to Chug Along Producing Cash November 9, 2011
Posted by shaferfinancial in Finance.Tags: Berkshire Hathaway 3rd Quarter, Berkshire is still cheap
add a comment
Headlines for Berkshire Hathaway after announcing its 3rd Quarter Results were predictably irrelevant to understanding how Berkshire is doing. Because the general market dropped in the 3rd quarter, Berkshire’s derivatives and equity portfolio did too. This variation masks the underlying reality that there was improving profits throughout the entire company.
Book Value dropped 1.7%, but is up over 6% year on year.
Operating results is what really shined. Operating earnings were $3.8B up 27.5% over last year’s 3rd quarter and up 41% over last quarter. BNSF revenue was up 13% with a 8% increase in profits over last year. Earnings at the utilities and energy companies were up 12.4%. Manufacturing, Service and Retailing were up a whopping 30%.
Insurance underwriting made over $1B profit last quarter a reversal of the $6B loss the quarter before. But, underwriting profit/loss varies greatly quarter to quarter so we don’t get worried about that number given their history of making a profit on underwriting more often than not. Pressure for upward movement in insurance premiums exists which probably means a larger float at the end of the year.
Cash on hand is still over $30B.
And this last quarter was the biggest buying spree of equities in the last 8 years for Berkshire. We have to wait a little longer to find out what was bought.
Berkshire remains heavily undervalued by the market by all accounts.
Buffett told us! October 7, 2011
Posted by shaferfinancial in Finance.Tags: Rail traffic surges
add a comment
Total North American rail traffic last week came in a 721K cars, up from 704K the week before and the highest levels since pre-Lehman 2008. Sept auto sales coming in at 13.1M SAAR. GDP for quarter 2 being revised up.
Buffett versus Momentum Traders and Economist October 6, 2011
Posted by shaferfinancial in Uncategorized.add a comment
Many economist are saying there are virtually certain we are going into another recession.
Chartist’s and momentum traders are insisting we will see a 20-50% drop in the S & P 500 in less than a year.
Truth is, I have no faith in my personal ability to know whether this will happen or not?
That is why over 10 years ago I starting selling my mutual funds and moved to a strategy where I don’t have to make market timing decisions. Or at least I wouldn’t have to watch the extreme variations in my retirement oriented accounts. Regular readers know that I now pursue three different strategies. I own a large EIUL which doesn’t go negative. I own several dividend producing stocks that pay me an increasing dividend year in and year out and when the stock price goes down my dividend reinvestment program is able to leverage dividends into even greater returns by buying the stock cheaper. And I own shares of Berkshire Hathaway a conglomerate that owns over 70 businesses and has produced superior returns since I started accumulating them. All of these strategies are long term oriented and designed so a bear market never hurts me no matter how long it lasts. And further you don’t have to have nerves of steel or sleepless nights to maintain your strategy. This has worked for me and dramatically improved my retirement planning.
Most regular readers also know I listen to Warren Buffet when he speaks about the market.
So it may be of interest to my readers Warren’s latest interview by Charlie Rose. In it he states that most of the businesses he owns are having banner years [exceptions are the home building, real estate businesses]. He sees no signs of falling demand for many of his major holdings. As to Berkshire Hathaway, he believes it is a screaming “buy” well below intrinsic value and has instituted the process to buy back shares at up to 10% above book value. Watching the market over the last few days I would guess he is buying back some shares. He has over $20B in cash that he can use to do this! He also states he has bought over $8B in additional equities this year, $4B in the last quarter. So who is right? Are stocks a screaming value now or are they on the precipice of a major drop? Could be both are right. But if you think long term and not short term, you are probably best served by listening to the greatest investor of our generation and not talking head economist on the TV IMHO.
Here is the link to the interview: Buffett
You tell me who you believe?
Buffett’s Problem September 27, 2011
Posted by shaferfinancial in Finance.Tags: Berkshire Undervalued, Warren Buffett Buyback
add a comment
Warrren Buffett has a huge problem. You see his company has been producing so much cash that he is now sitting on a hoard of cash. He just bought another company Lubrizol for $9B, and is looking at another, Transatlantic, but he still is sitting on $43B in cash. On top of that Mr. Market has lowered the value of Berkshire down to almost book value.
What to do? Well he has told the market that he will repurchase stock at up to 10% above book value [Somewhere around $109,000 per A share]. In his statement he basically says that the stock price is a screaming buy according to his conservative analysis.
Since the announcement the stock has been going up [Now over $110,000] just like it did in 1999 when he made a similar announcement. But what he has done is simply put a floor on pricing for the time being.
Buffett could easily buy $20B of his stock if the price warrants it. That’s alot. And every month Berkshire produces over $1B more in cash!
Are people out there really willing to bet against the skills of Buffet in valuing companies and making good deals?
