jump to navigation

What I found during my search for an alternative to MUTUAL FUNDS? April 27, 2009

Posted by shaferfinancial in Finance, Uncategorized.
Tags: , , ,
trackback

Ten years ago, I took a look at my mutual fund accounts and what I saw was very disappointing.  Despite the overall upward movement that occurred in the 1990s, it didn’t seem to turn into the type of numbers I needed to create significant retirement income.  So began my search for an alternative financial instrument.  During my research time on mutual funds I became disillusioned with the whole idea of mutual funds ever performing well in producing retirement income.  I thought I would share the fruits of my research and thinking about mutual funds in a concise form.  Now,  I have written several posts in the past covering different parts of my thinking, but thought it would be useful to put it into a concise form for the reader.

1.  The reported investment returns for mutual funds is totally dependent upon when you start and when you need to use the money.  In other words, the difference between the theory of what the individual returns can be and what are the actual results is extremely wide.  Even making an assumption that you will invest in mutual funds over a 30-35 year period [which is not likely according to the data], there are entire decades that if you retire into would give dramatically lower returns like the last decade.  So much of your success is determined by pure luck.

2.  The idea of diversification behind the design of mutual funds does reduce stock picking risk, but does not reduce market [systemic] risk.  The resulting risk reduction is skewed toward the upside.  In other words you can reduce you chance of loss any given year to -60% by using diversification techniques [including asset diversification] but in order to do that you given up the 250% upside that is possible by choosing a single stock that does well.  This skewed reduction of variance results in taking it on the chin during market wide downturns [like now], but inhibits your ability to recover from the loss.  Does anyone really think that they will recover from a 50% loss in their mutual funds anytime in the next few years? After all to get back to EVEN, you need to have a 100% gain!  How long will that take inside a mutual fund?

3.  The majority of folks invest in mutual funds inside their companies 401K.  These funds are heavily laden with fees that bleeds the overall returns significantly.  On top of that the idea of deferring income taxes on inputs today in order to pay them on the total account values of tomorrow strikes me as simply silly.  At the very least, your tax bill will be several times the amount you could have paid today, and that is assuming tax rates don’t rise and you are in a lower tax bracket during retirement.  These assumptions are simply not logical given today’s economic environment.

4.  Investing in mutual funds encourages passivity with one’s finances.  Invest automatically; put money in today and don’t worry it will be there for you in the future;  you have diversified away all the risk;  the market has returned 10% since WWII, and there is no reason to believe it won’t do the same in the future; our money managers can beat the market, or alternatively no one can beat the market so the best you can expect is market returns [this ignores the existence of people like Warren Buffet, George Soros, Ben Gramam], making money in the investment world is easy just let dollar cost averaging and the market tide take you to wealth, etc.  Heard any of these?  Well they all have a small, very small grain of truth embedded in them, but for the most part are simply propaganda used to sell mutual funds.  Being passive in your financial life leads to only one thing, being poor and the data points this out too.

5.   The actual results from folks investing in mutual funds is very poor.  Currently, a 1.8% return for those investing over the last 20 years.  Now, critics will say unfair to look at it in the depth of a bear market, but before the bear market of 2008 started the returns were only 4.4% with a twenty year look back.  The data on how large of retirement accounts people have is another signal data point and even at its peak it was less than $90,000 for the 55-64 age group.  You simply can’t find any data out there that points to this being a successful investment strategy even before the 2008 bear market!  When it comes to successful mutual fund investing, it is literally all theory and totally divorced from reality.

The bottom line is that mutual fund investing as a retirement vehicle is a total failure.  This has driven me to find alternative methods of building up a retirement account and reformed my ideas of personal finance.  This journey that I hope to take my readers along has transformed my thinking in many areas.  But first you have to decide to stop doing what has failed and start looking for something better!

Advertisements

Comments»

1. » What I found during my search for an alternative to MUTUAL FUNDS … | The Best Mutual Funds - April 27, 2009

[…] story here shaferfinancial Fund My Mutual Fund: Bookkeeping: Weekly Changes to Fund Positions […]

2. Investing All Your Money in Mutual Funds Once is a Mistake, Twice is Stupid, But Three Times.... | Protect Your Nest Egg in Retirement - April 28, 2009

[…] investments for some of your money. Read this article at Uncommon Financial Wisdom called, “What I found during my search for an alternative to MUTUAL FUNDS? It’s a well written article with some good information about Mutual Funds. There will be some […]

3. investmentblogger - April 28, 2009

Great article Dave! Its unfortunate and surprising to see so many people still not realizing that mutual funds is not the magical retirement vehicle its been marketed to be.

4. Shaun FitzPatrick - March 23, 2010

I noticed the Ric edelman these days is touting ETFs. What do you think? Isn’t Brk.b/a basically an ETF with a stellar manager?

shaferfinancial - March 23, 2010

Yes, he is. But, I believe there is a critical difference between an index ETF and having Warren Buffett doing asset allocation. Over the last 40 years Buffett’s returns has doubled the S & P 500. Even looking at the last 10-15-20 year periods the doubling of the S & P holds. Also the expenses in Berkshire Hathaway are significantly lower than even buying and ETF. Index ETFs still have to trade for no reason but having to keep balanced ownership in the fund. And finally, most indexed funds own hundreds of businesses, while Buffett keeps the assets concentrated [as well as he can with the size of BRK].

Finally, who do you want managing your investments, some no-name ETF manager or Warren Buffett, et al.?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: